Who we work with
We work across the market rather than at one point in it.
ORIGIN is not a provider of clinical services and does not place benefits, so it does not compete for an intermediary's commission and does not displace what they already sell. The analysis sits behind their service, which is what makes it usable by the same markets it could otherwise compete with.
Two ways in
Buying the outcome
Employers
An employer carries the cost of workforce health risk and wants the risk understood. ORIGIN provides the analysis directly, across whichever suppliers the employer already uses.
Buying the analysis
Insurers, intermediaries, third-party administrators, occupational health providers and wellbeing platforms
Each of these already sells something to the employer. ORIGIN would sit behind that service as the analytical layer, under their relationship.
The second group are channels as much as they are competitors. That is possible because ORIGIN provides neither the benefit nor the clinical service: there is no commission to compete for, no provider network to protect and nothing in the analysis that replaces what they deliver.
ORIGIN helps these parties identify the gaps in the products and services they or others provide, and gives them health intelligence they would not normally have.
Employers
What you are trying to answer
- Are our benefits addressing what our people actually have?
- What is driving absence and productivity loss?
- Where is the risk concentrated by role and by site?
Where ORIGIN fits
ORIGIN consolidates data across the suppliers an employer already uses, rather than asking that any of them be replaced.
The analysis assesses underlying cause and the contributory risks behind it, rather than the symptom that presents.
What you would use
These are examples rather than the full set of what an employer could use.
Insurers
What you are trying to answer
- Which cohorts drive claims cost, and why?
- Are interventions changing the underlying risk, or only the claim?
- How do biopsychosocial factors affect incidence, prevalence, duration and cost?
Where ORIGIN fits
ORIGIN would sit as an analysis layer across a book or a scheme, independent of any provider network and of the cover itself.
Because ORIGIN neither underwrites nor delivers clinical services, the analysis informs the insurer's own proposition rather than competing with it.
Intermediaries
What you are trying to answer
- What should we recommend to this client, and on what evidence?
- How do we demonstrate that a placement worked?
- How do we hold a client conversation that goes beyond price?
Where ORIGIN fits
ORIGIN does not place benefits and takes no commission on them, so the analysis strengthens an intermediary's advice rather than competing with it.
The evidence sits behind the intermediary's own service, in the intermediary's own client relationship.
Some intermediaries regard themselves as consultants rather than brokers, and the same fit applies either way.
Third-party administrators
What you are trying to answer
- What does our claims and case data say about cause?
- Can we report to clients on outcomes rather than volumes?
Where ORIGIN fits
ORIGIN correlates across the data an administrator already holds and processes, without changing how it is administered.
The result is an analytical view that can be offered alongside an existing administration service.
Occupational health providers
What you are trying to answer
- What sits behind the presenting condition?
- Why do some cases recur?
- When is a referral avoidable?
- How can I reduce my administration costs and remain competitive for my clients?
Where ORIGIN fits
ORIGIN adds the psychosocial and personal risk assessment that sits outside a standard fitness-for-work question, which is a different question from the one occupational health is commissioned to answer.
It is a complementary layer: the clinical judgement, the consultation and the report remain entirely with the occupational health provider.
Wellbeing platforms
What you are trying to answer
- Is engagement translating into changed risk?
- Which cohorts are we not reaching?
Where ORIGIN fits
ORIGIN would act as a measurement layer that is independent of the platform being measured, because it provides neither the content nor the benefit.
That independence is what makes the measurement worth showing to the platform's own clients.
Two ways to begin.
Tell us what you already hold and what you are trying to understand, and we will explain how the analysis would apply in your case.